“Why must the pressure that a flange can withstand at ambient temperature be discounted under high‑temperature service conditions?” This is one of the most frequently encountered yet easily oversimplified questions in flange selection. The material mechanics logic behind pressure‑temperature ratings deserves in‑depth understanding by every piping engineer.
The basic definition of a pressure‑temperature rating is the maximum allowable working pressure, expressed as gauge pressure, at a specified temperature. As temperature rises, the maximum allowable working pressure decreases accordingly. The root cause of this pattern lies in the temperature dependence of material mechanical properties—as temperature increases, both yield strength and tensile strength of the material decline, and the pressure‑bearing capacity of the flange naturally decays.
The concept of the derating factor provides a tool for rapid assessment. The derating factor is the ratio of the pressure rating at elevated temperature to the pressure rating at ambient temperature. The derating factor is independent of pressure class—for the same material group, Class 150, 300, 600, or any other class is subject to the same derating factor. This means engineers can first use the derating factor to quickly judge whether a material’s load‑bearing capacity at the target temperature is sufficient, and then consult the specific pressure‑temperature tables for precise verification.
Different materials exhibit significantly different temperature sensitivities. Taking the American standard material system as an example, carbon steel A105 (Material Group 1.1) shows relatively rapid strength decay at elevated temperatures, whereas chrome‑molybdenum alloy steel F11 (Material Group 1.9) has a noticeably higher derating factor at the same temperature, indicating better retention of high‑temperature load‑bearing capacity. Austenitic stainless steels F304 and F316 exhibit derating behaviour between these two extremes, with distinct characteristics in the medium‑to‑high temperature range. This difference means that under high‑temperature conditions, material selection has an enormous impact on the actual pressure‑bearing capacity of the flange—choosing the wrong material may cause the flange to fail at pressures far below expectations.
A key practical judgement principle is that if the pressure‑temperature ratings of two flanges in a connection are different, the pressure‑temperature rating of the pair shall be governed by the lower‑rated flange. This “cask principle” is particularly important when flanges of dissimilar materials are paired. For intermediate temperatures, linear interpolation is permitted to determine the maximum allowable working pressure at that temperature.
Low‑temperature conditions also require attention. For any temperature below minus 29°C, the maximum allowable working pressure shall not exceed the maximum allowable working pressure at minus 29°C. Minus 29°C is the boundary between ambient and low‑temperature service, a limit converted from the Fahrenheit temperature scale in American standards. Below this temperature, material toughness decreases, the failure mode of the flange shifts from ductile fracture toward brittle fracture, and more conservative pressure control is therefore required.
Understanding the essence of pressure‑temperature ratings is not merely about meeting code requirements—it is about having a clear awareness of the safety boundary of the flange connection. Under high‑ or low‑temperature conditions, flange selection cannot rely solely on the nominal pressure at ambient temperature; the pressure‑temperature rating corresponding to the actual working temperature must be consulted.
All data are sourced from publicly available sources and are provided for learning, communication, and reference purposes only. If there are any errors, please contact for correction. Please make your own judgment, this website assumes no responsibility.